Comments:
Shefaly on September 10th, 2007 at 11:51 am #
I think the new books against religion are a response to failure of rationality in the masses. Your figures (US I mean) are more publicised but a recent survey shows 3/4 of UK population believes that creation was how the world came about. Poor Darwin! He must be rolling in his grave, or if you believe creationists, burning in Hell. When Christians convert to Islam, law of conservation of mass is at work in my view. They are also both Abrahamic in origin. The two religions are not very different. So I fail to understand conversions except for the novelty factor. A bit like a new romance which then settles into something more stable when one starts raising important questions related to meaning, stability, durability etc. Interesting points. I think children are more open-minded than adults give them credit for. My siblings attended a ‘Convent’ school with nuns etc but are more conventionally religious about Hinduism than I am. I grew up heathen!
Shefaly on September 10th, 2007 at 11:53 am #
Sorry the rest of the comment is here: I did not attend any school with a ‘religious’ bent. A Hindu friend I know attended Jewish school in Africa and is more traditionally Hindu too, married now to a Huguenot and aims to bring her children up in a brusque atheistic tradition. Yet another friend wanted to be a nun when she was 8 till she was 14 and discovered boys! Children will probably make up their own mind. As of now, as you say hoping for the best is your best bet.
vidya on September 10th, 2007 at 12:17 pm #
Interestingly, right after I wrote this post, I met the founder of a very effective charity called Home of Hope who said over and over that she found a ‘higher calling’ to serve. I respect her sentiments and am fully aware of the good that faith can do. The key is that nebulous thing called ’spirituality’. Communicating spirituality to a child in the absence of religion is really hard to do though.
Shefaly on September 10th, 2007 at 1:26 pm #
I have heard that ‘higher calling’ line of logic before. When questioned with the 7-whys method, you will find yourself - and they will find themselves - scratching beneath the surface. It boils down to a far greater degree of discomfort, than fellow humans may share, with the status quo and the unfairness inherent in it. Finding themselves unable to articulate or ‘quantify’ or otherwise meaningfully express this desire to ‘correct things’ so their own discomfort would reduce, many adults call it their higher calling or whatever. The psychology of philanthropy explains things in similar terms. Sound cynical I know. That said, encouraging kids to ask 7-Whys will make sure they never accept a flaky argument or fait accompli presented to them! (You can see why I am such a popular aunt. I answer those 7-Whys!)
vidya on September 10th, 2007 at 1:40 pm #
The 7-whys method is precisely what my kids use on me till I deploy my parental Brahmastra -’because I say so!’ Interesting how human beings can patent common sense!
Shefaly on September 10th, 2007 at 2:05 pm #
It is an interesting tool because it forces the respondent to think. In causal studies this is a very effective tool and trumps most other methods. They are along the right path so they will sort religion for themselves too!
Shefaly on October 10th, 2007 at 11:15 pm #
Vidya: An inadvertent meme on parents & religion has started in the blogosphere. My post links to the other posts that led to it being written. I thought you may find it interesting. Thanks.
Gurinder Kohli on January 23rd, 2008 at 8:04 pm #
Religion should be personal. Post a comment
|
|